[nikanj]

I'm surprised it didn't fix it by removing the code. In my experience, if you give Claude a failing test, it fixes it by hard-coding the code to return the value expected by the test or something similar.

Last week I asked it to look at why a certain device enumeration caused a sigsegv, and it quickly solved the issue by completely removing the enumeration. No functionality, no bugs!

[pessimizer]

I've got a paste in prompt that reiterates multiple times not to remove features or debugging output without asking first, and not to blame the test file/data that the program failed on. Repeated multiple times, the last time in all caps. It still does it. I hope maybe half as often, but I may be fooling myself.