|
|
|
|
|
by bgwalter
236 days ago
|
|
If you mean GnuPG, that is what Snowden used. It could be better than new software that may have new bugs. Memory safety is a very small part of cryptographic safety. (New cryptographic software can also be developed by all sorts of people. In this case I'm not familiar, but we do know that GnuPG worked for the highest profile case imaginable.) |
|
Ironically, it was the urge not to roll your own cryptography that got people caught in GPG-related security vulnerabilities.