[hackernewds]

why train LLMs on preprint inaccurate findings?

[nandomrumber]

Peer review doesn’t, never was intended to, and shouldn’t, guarantee accuracy nor veracity.

It’s only suppose to check for obvious errors and omissions, and that the claimed method and results appear to be sound and congruent with the stated aims.

[Sharlin]

That would explain some thing, in fact.