[jraph]

> Either require a fee (processing power, captcha etc) or make a private password (auth)

Well, I shouldn't have to work or make things worse for everybody because the LLM bros decided to screw us.

> It is inherently a cat and mouse game that you CHOOSE to play

No, let's not reverse the roles and blame the victims here. We sysadmins and authors are willing to share our work publicly to the world but never asked for it to be abused.

[jack_pp]

That's like saying you shouldn't have to sanitize your database inputs because you never asked for people to SQL inject your database. This stance is truly mind boggling to me

[jraph]

Would you take the defense of attackers using SQL injections? Because it feels like people here, including you, are defending the llm scrapers against sysadmins and authors who dare share their work publicly.

Ensuring basic security and robustness of a piece of software is simply not remotely comparable to countering the abuse these llm companies carry on.

But it's not even the point. And preventing SQL injections (through healthy programming practices) doesn't make things worse for any legitimate user neither.

[catlifeonmars]

It’s both. You should sanitize your inputs because there are bad actors, but you also categorize attempts to sql inject as abuse and there is legal recourse.