[embedding-shape]

> suno's model cannot possibly be aware of how AI is being treated

I don't know exactly what training material went into Suno's models, but if it includes random collections of text from the internet, it could very well have included "man, AI is fucking stupid and I treat it as such" in it's training datasets.

Now I won't claim that that suddenly makes the models "aware" of it, because surely we'll understand "aware" different and this will turn into a different conversations, but I don't see it as impossible that some models could have training data that includes text with how some humans feel about AI.

[QuercusMax]

Aren't we talking about the auditory quality of the generated vocals? I'm don't understand how you could possibly think the textual training data could possibly impact the perceived vocal strain (which are actually just artifacts) of the generated vocals.

[embedding-shape]

Don't they have models that do text-to-speech and maybe even audio/speech-to-text? If so, there is surely text in the datasets, otherwise I'm not sure how they'd accomplish something like that.

[roywiggins]

It makes some sense with LLMs, but unless Suno is informed that it should play the part of an intelligent AI, how would it even know to "care"?