Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by cactusplant7374 227 days ago
People were listening to slop long before Suno.
1 comments

So let’s encourage more slop at an accelerated pace? That’s our answer to everything huh. We’ve been doing “arguably bad thing” X, so let’s amplify it.
Sometimes culture gets a little sloppy.
Let people have fun.
Let the fire burn through everything, it's fun to watch. That until it consumes the land under you. Well, this is metaphorically speaking.

I have no problem with AI tools per see, however what bothers me is the flood of sloop that is inescapable. If things were tagged AI and I could opt out when I'm not looking for that kind of content I'd be totally fine with it, it's just a took after all.

I think this technology is a net gain for the elderly. It's so easy to be creative and have great results.
I mean sure, if you ignore all the negative externalities then it is a net gain for everyone.
That doesn't address my comment on the elderly.
Makes online scams more realistic, which are predominantly targeted at the elderly.

Makes journalism even more useless, ruining democracy for the rest of us.

Decimating all other artistic livelihoods, putting more strain on society.

Sure all these things have already been happening. But again, I am dumbfounded that a lot of people are actually saying “yes, let’s make all of that worse exponentially. Being able to do “fun thing” at the speed of thought is worthy tradeoff”.

Everyday at $work me and my colleagues put a lot of effort into deciding what tool/framework/architecture to use, listing all tradeoffs and deciding the most appropriate one. I’m sure a lot of people on this forum do this every day too. I don’t understand why those same people don’t put the same effort to make the same thoughtful decisions on the thing that _actually_ _actually_ matters.

making music you dont like has negative externalities?