[pms]

This "research" and data access wouldn't be allowed under the DSA, because (i) the researcher didn't provide any data protection safeguards, (ii) his university (and data protection officer) didn't assume legal liability for his research, (iii) his research isn't focused on systemic risks to society.

[tguvot]

not sure what's the point that you are making. but under "common sense comments act of 2054" unclear comments are not allowed.

[brendoelfrendo]

The article for this post is about the EU's Digital Services Act (DSA). Since the original comment argues against research access to data by arguing that "Cambridge Analytica was research as well," another poster chimed in to rebut that assertion by arguing that Aleksandr Kogan's research would not have been allowed access to user data under the DSA and thus, that specific legal concern is moot.

[tguvot]

kogan "research" harvested data through application and he was outside of eu.

so even it was happening today, whatever he did is irrelevant to EU/DSA unless they plan to chase everybody across the globe. somewhat like ofcom going after 4chan

[shakna]

That's precisely what the EU is doing with Clearview AI [0].

> Max Schrems: “We even run cross-border criminal procedures for stolen bikes, so we hope that the public prosecutor also takes action when the personal data of billions of people was stolen – as has been confirmed by multiple authorities.”

[0] https://noyb.eu/en/criminal-complaint-against-facial-recogni...

[tguvot]

Based on your quote looks like this is what eu not doing.

I like this quote more

Max Schrems: “Clearview AI seems to simply ignore EU fundamental rights and just spits in the face of EU authorities.”

[shakna]

Hence why the upgrade to criminal charges against the company's officials.

There is _not_ a lack of action on behalf of the EU, here. They are "chasing" those responsible.