|
|
|
|
|
by bayindirh
236 days ago
|
|
I read a comment somewhere, possibly here by an ex-Apple engineer who claimed that they optimized the thing mathematically for the performance it exhibits. So, considering its silicon parts, Rosetta 2 is more of an Apple endeavor and technology. On the other hand 5-7 years a very typical timespan for Apple. So, I don't think licensing fees were that important while ending support for it. |
|