|
|
|
|
|
by cb321
235 days ago
|
|
I'm not an expert on the case law, but supposedly United States v. General Electric Co. et al., 82 F.Supp. 753 (D.N.J. 1949) indicates that whatever design trade-offs might have existed, corporate policy makers were really just trying to screw consumers [1] (which is why they probably had to agree on short lifespans as a cartel rather than just market "this line of bulbs for these preferences" vs. "this other line for other people" -- either as a group or separate vendors). I keep waiting for the other shoe to drop where they figure out how to make LED bulbs crappy enough to need replacement. EDIT: and, shucks, @kragen beat me to it! :-) [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phoebus_cartel#cite_ref-USvGE-... |
|