[Grimblewald]

Right, you hit the nail on the head.

> problem is people who use without reviewing outputs

the problem here is there is no reason to beleive OP reviewed or even fully understands the code. There is plenty of evidence of OP lying.

All in all best case scenario is we have a codebase made by someone dishonest and incompetant, and at worst it is plausible there is an intentional effort to obfuscated the codebase in an effort to slip people malware.

the entire thing stinks, and cannot be trusted. It deserves (oweing the dishonesty) a rather strong negative response and nothing more.