|
|
|
|
|
by sherr
237 days ago
|
|
I agree to an extent but they are usefully kept somewhat separate. The introduction to the great "Encyclopedia of Fantasy" put this well. Re: Fantasy : "Its roots go much deeper into history, and its concerns are more archetypal" [1] There can be a lot of cross-over of course. Right now, "fantasy" (perhaps of the "romantic" variety) seems to be a juggernaut and is taking over. [1]https://sf-encyclopedia.com/fe/introduction (edit: spelling) |
|