| HN Mirror

> ...I don't use Debian or Ubuntu...

Neither do I.

I've been using Gentoo for twenty-three years (since 2002). I stopped looking for equally-well-managed alternatives somewhere between 2012 and 2015. I have enough local compute that the build times for everything other than Chromium aren't a problem. If I didn't, I could use the official prebuilt binary packages that have been around for a few years.

> ...I don't think it's a good idea to only support [.deb or .rpm packages].

If you can do more, you should, yes. However, -as a hobbyist open-source programmer- I recognize that other hobbyists only have so much time and giveashit available.

The absolute best thing they can do is provide a source tarball that builds and installs correctly with './configure && make && make install' [0] or the language-specific equivalent. Any competent distro package management system will make it somewhere between trivial and pretty easy for others to package projects like this up. [1]

If they have more time and giveashit available, make prebuilt .deb packages so that your software is trivially installable for the most users out there. If you find yourself with more spare resources, then write packages for other OS package managers to get the remaining small fraction of Linux users.

The absolute worst thing to do would be to assume you MUST package your software for every distro out there (lest someone whine at you on the Internet), decide that that's way too much work, and not publish anything. As someone who has many, many unstarted projects because they seem like way too much work, I can tell you that that's a totally real failure mode.

[0] Perhaps with an optional side-trip to 'make test'.

[1] Unless they're using something godawful to package like NodeJS.