|
|
|
|
|
by Retric
237 days ago
|
|
JPEG-XL is optimized for the low to zero levels of compression which isn’t as commonly used on the web, but definitely fills a need. Google citied insufficient improvements which is a rather ambiguous statement. Mozilla seems more concerned with the attack surface. |
|
For the same reason it would be good if a future revision of PDF/A would include JPEG XL, since it doesn't really have any decent codecs for low-loss (but not losless) compression (e.g. JPEG sucks at color schematics/drawings and losless is impractically big for them). It did get JP2 but support for that is quite uncommon.