[ViewTrick1002]

Love it. Just pretend that you can separate the grid into a ”baseload” portion and ”everything” else.

Like I said, on a yearly basis the Californian grid goes from 15GW to 50 GW.

That your nuclear grid will collapse when a cold spell hits leading to people freezing to death is fine.

Thats a socialized loss! Someone else will need to solve it!

I love that you completely ignored the Swedish example from last week.

And then with a sleight of hand ignored that the French nuclear issues persisted throughout the entire energy crisis winter.

[mpweiher]

LOL.

Like France's grid has collapsed every year for the last 40 years.

And of course California's grid is well known for its stability. Or was that brownouts, rolling blackouts and high prices? Well, one of the two.

Nice chatting with you. Well, amusing at least.

Sweden just approved new nuclear construction, after rescinding a nuclear exit.

[ViewTrick1002]

So it is apparently fine to balance a nuclear grid with fossil fuels????

Just pretend that the fossil fuels doesn’t exist by exporting the nuclear electricity and have someone else build them and balance both grids!

What do you think would happen if you tried sticking two French grids with an over supply of nuclear powered electricity when no one wants the electricity next to each other?

You mean the brownouts storage and renewables have now completely fixed?

Yeah, way faster than handouts to new built nuclear power and waiting until the 2040s for the solution!

> Sweden just approved new nuclear construction, after rescinding a nuclear exit.

Yes. The current government has spent soon four years pushing paperwork around. They want nuclear power without having to accept the costs.

They seem to not want to have the costs associated with new built nuclear power subsidies on their political records for their entire careers.

I bet they will push through a monstrous handout package the final weeks before the election next September and then spend years crying about it being cut.