Mostly the repetitive stuff like README generation and pushing code with meaningful commit messages was handled by AI. The actual work and logic were done by me.
If the AI did the boilerplate that implies it was not fully written by you.
The “meaningful commit messages” — again are a single period as the message for a single commit for the entire python portion of the codebase.
My question was rhetorical. Whether the AI did it or a human did, it burns credibility to refer to things that don’t exist (like “meaningful commit messages”)
What AI did:
- Generated README templates (boilerplate markdown)
- Suggested commit messages (I didn't always edit them)
- Helped with documentation structure
What I wrote:
- All Python training logic (train.py, trainer.py, callbacks)
- All model architectures (gpt.py, tiny.py, small.py, etc.)
- Tokenizer integration
- Data pipeline
- CLI scaffolding (
Or the meaningful commit message of “.”
And the commit editing 1,000s of lines of python code mislabeled as a docs change?