|
|
|
|
|
|
by marvinborner
231 days ago
|
|
|
Good idea, I like "caramelized"! However, I wouldn't define bruijn as being caramelized just yet. Personally, I view as syntactic sugar only syntax that's expanded to the target language by the parser/compiler. In bruijn's case, there is barely any of such syntax sugar aside of number/string/char encodings. Everything else is part of the infix/prefix/mixfix standard library definitions which get substituted as part of the translation to LC. |
|
|