|
|
|
|
|
by whilenot-dev
232 days ago
|
|
> Also note that `Return<User>` should be just `User` if you prefer to specify the return type explicitly. No? first_user = data[0] assigns User | undefined to first_user, since the list isn't guaranteed to be non-empty. I expect Return to be implemented as type Return<T> = T | undefined, so Return<User> makes sense. |
|
I assumed `Return<User>` was a mistake, not a custom type as you suggest. But your interpretation seems more likely anyway.