|
|
|
|
|
|
by JumpCrisscross
242 days ago
|
|
|
> anti-AI people think the advice and information you can get from a good model (if you know how to operate it well) is less valuable than the advice and information you can get from a book Those people exist and they’re wrong. More frequently, however, I find I’m judging the model less than its user. If I get an email that smells of AI, I ignore it. That’s partly because I have the luxury to do so. It’s largely because engaging has commonly proven fruitless. You see a similar effect on HN. Plenty of people use AI to think through problems. But the comments that quote it directly are almost always trash. |
|
|
Because the output is almost always trash, and it takes re-doing the work and then claiming that it came from LLMs for it not to be.
These tools are being sold to me as similar to what a Jr engineer offers me, but that's not at all true because I would fire a Jr that came to me with such bullshit and needing such significant hand-holding so often as what I see coming out of an LLM.