| I've recently been experimenting with this; it can be dangerous for you (read on) but if well managed it can be more flexible for both you and the client. For a long time I've been playing around with how I charge; a few weeks ago we had a discussion r.e. hourly vs. daily rates (I prefer the former, as it works best for me). But in the last ~2 months I've been working on ways to charge on a target basis. Or to put it another way; I agree a schedule with my client, and they pay as I reach each milestone. This takes time almost entirely out of the negotiation. It has other benefits too; for example it forces the client to work on a formal specification (as an engineer, this is crucial!) for a project. I have flexibility on how I reach the goals we agree - I might give a deadline estimate (two weeks for milestone 1, a further week for milestone 2). Whether I do the work on a Monday, or part of Weds and Fri, is irrelevant to them. And so I have the flexibility to schedule all of my work as is convenient. Internally I am figuring out that it requires X hours work for each milestone - but the client never sees this, they just see my quoted figure and the delivery date. But I have found that this way I can up my rates significantly - I suspect because clients are measuring cost in terms of deliverables, rather than hourly or daily rate. I spent a lot of time working up my rate from £40/hr (three years ago) to £100/hr through various mechanisms. But I have struggled to breach that barrier for a while now. My ultimate aim is £200/hr (which, as a full-stack engineer with years of experience & happy clients, is what I think my time is worth). This new method is currently "testing" at around £120/hr and I am slowly increasing it, without issue so far. This also helps for existing clients too; if you start working with someone at £40/hr it's hard to build your rate up significantly without putting them off [I lost a very solid client on the jump from £60 - £100]. But if clients don't know your rates, upping them by £10/hr will be much less visible, and they only have to judge whether the total cost is worth the outcome. So, I think I would be happy in saying - your theory is sound, and seems to be working out for me in practice :) |