|
|
|
|
|
by scottlamb
232 days ago
|
|
> I think of verifiable images as something for legal purposes. That makes sense to me, but who is this particular $399 camera made for? Can you imagine someone choosing it for a photo they intend to be used in legal proceedings? The specs and appearance do not scream high-quality professional tool to me. The price is lower than a professional would be willing to spend (on something high-quality), higher than someone would drop on a whim. It looks kinda like a designer's school assignment that they're trying to sell. |
|