[cryptonector]

No we're not. We're using dNSName subjectAlternativeName values. We used to use the CN attribute of the subject DN, and... there is still code for that, but it's obsolete.

We _are_ using subject DNs for linking certs to their issuers, but though that's "free-form", we don't parse them, we only check for equality.

[cyberax]

CN is absolutely used everywhere. And it can contain wildcards. SANs are also free-form.

[cryptonector]

SANs are not free-form. A dNSName SAN is supposed to have an FQDN. An rfc822Name SAN is supposed to carry an email address. And, ok, sure, email addresses' mailbox part is basically free-form, but so what, you don't interpret that part unless you've accepted that certificate for that email address' domain part, and then you interpret the mailbox part the way a mail server would because you're probably the mail server. Yes, you can have directoryName SANs, but the whole point of SANs is that DNs suck because x.400/x.500 naming sucks so we want to use something that isn't that.

[cyberax]

> to have an FQDN

With wildcards.

[cryptonector]

Ah yes, you're right. That is a horrible bodge.