[roarcher]

In another comment you're defending AI girlfriends, and you're going to tell me what "normal" people who don't live on the internet do?

As a matter of fact, all the actually normal people I talk to about AI in person also find it offputting.

[fart-fart-FART]

that comment doesn't "defend" AI girlfriends, it points out the absurdity of condemning AI girlfriends in a world where porn and prostitution exist and are widely accepted by the "polite society".

also, case in point, normal people don't dig through a random stranger's post history to look for an ad hominem opportunity, and instead evaluate individual posts by their contents. lol.

[roarcher]

The combination of a brand new account with an incredibly juvenile username and careless writing (lack of capitalization in your case) usually is a red flag for a spam account, so yes, in these cases I usually check comments to see if I'm wasting my time with a troll.

Porn is still taboo. It's understood that most people use it, but it's not exactly something you bring up in polite company.

Where on earth do you live that prostitution is "widely accepted by polite society"? You can go to jail for it where I am.

And I did address the rest of your comment. As I said, in my experience "normal" people do object to AI content. I don't know where you got the bit about "background checks" and being "allowed" to like stuff. Nobody I know had to be told to have an aversion to AI "art", it's a natural reaction.