> trusted with big, critical open source projects.
You talk as if the community has appointed Google to take care of these projects. Google is spending $$$ writing code and open sourcing it. Not the other way around.
And as with anything open source, if you dont like the direction of open source code - fork it.
If I have an open source project, you dont say 'bitpush cant be trusted with the project'.
The Play Store services are not a critical open source project, though. The AOSP is still intact and maintained in accordance with the licensing.
The application signing backtrack is an issue, but more of a political problem than a technical one. America's lesson here has been written on the wall for years: regulate your tech businesses, or your tech businesses will regulate you.
You talk as if the community has appointed Google to take care of these projects. Google is spending $$$ writing code and open sourcing it. Not the other way around.
And as with anything open source, if you dont like the direction of open source code - fork it.
If I have an open source project, you dont say 'bitpush cant be trusted with the project'.