|
|
|
|
|
by caminante
241 days ago
|
|
I already did. Your reply/edit merely repeated your prior observation. Getting back to the point: You literally claimed that one of these would "inevitabl[y]" trigger a Kessler effect with no proof. > something literally 1000x bigger be even more concerning. Again, this isn't convincing if you don't have the denominator/context. Think about it: you still can't answer how many of these are needed to trigger the Kessler effect. BTW, "increase by a FACTOR of about 300" != "increase in a RISK FACTOR of over 300" |
|