|
|
|
|
|
by _carbyau_
236 days ago
|
|
That whole "tyranny of the rocket equation" thing is why I am surprised the actual first stage for launching a rocket is NOT a ground based reusable "up-chucker". Basically, I would have thought that any momentum that can be imparted to the rocket before it has to rely on its self propulsion would be a huge help. Not talking about eliminating self propulsion, just an assist so the rocket could carry a larger payload or be smaller or whatever. IE like a variation on Jules Verne's big gun for throwing the payload up there but engineered to be plausible and having the rocket still be self propelled. And safe. But we don't seem to do this. So why? Edit: First part of video [0]. Apparently it's not completely dumb. Just stupid-hard/impossible to do practically at the size required for big rockets and payloads. But small ones might work. Maybe. [0] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lWYn5hl4QWg |
|
Chuckers are the optimal large scale solution for airless bodies, but they're horizontal. You spread the acceleration out over a very long distance so you don't need a super beefy spacecraft and your humans won't turn to goo. Basically, a maglev train except it has track above as well as below and it doesn't have a maximum speed. Wrap one around the lunar equator and it can eject anywhere from sundiver to interstellar escape with human-tolerable acceleration.