Talking about the naked, open corruption and bribery is considered gauche in polite society. Executing random Colombian fisherman, OTOH, is perfectly fine.
The connection is very clear. Amazing Krugman piece. There's still a little bit of a why question to me? What will Citrone or anyone else ever be able to provide back, since they all know this is going to fail, & are using this loan to jack up prices & exit their positions?
Maybe there's some more elaborate way this will enrich certain American cronies. Maybe.
But I tend to think the answer comes if we look back 80 years. A lot of bad evil people needed a friendly state to run to after WWII ended. Today, beyond just being friends-of-an-(evil-doing)-feather together with some other exploitative public-services-destroying extremists, part of me thinks, maybe perhaps: Argentina is being set up as a new exit, a new place to flee too, when justice comes a calling.
> Citrone, the co-founder of Discovery Capital Management, is also a friend and former colleague of Bessent—a fact that has not been previously reported in US media outlets. Citrone, by his own account, helped make Bessent very wealthy.
I think it's simply that Bessent can give his buddy (Citrone), who made him (Bessent) "very wealthy," a bailout at zero cost to any of them. $20 billion is really insignificant for the US government, even if a gross waste of tax dollars, and they know there's not going to be a single repercussion.
> Argentina is being set up as a new exit, a new place to flee too, when justice comes a calling.
I too have been thinking that lately. It wouldn't be ideal for any of them but, from their perspectives, it surely would be better than the alternative.
>So while millions of children must die to save a few billion dollars, taxpayers are on the hook for billions more to bail out Bessent’s hedge fund buddies in a predictably futile attempt to save the Elon Musk of the South.
It's a good thing he didn't give into hyperbole...
Which part of that sentence do you think is hyperbole?
> Forecasting models predicted that the current steep funding cuts could result in more than 14,051,750 (uncertainty interval 8,475,990-19,662,191) additional all-age deaths, including 4,537,157 (3,124,796-5,910,791) in children younger than age 5 years, by 2030.
It will be damn hard to get Bessent or close sources to him to confirm it.
Sometimes you have to go by circumstantial evidence which, in this case, is quite clear: Rob Citrone helped Bessent to make a lot of money, Citrone is deeply invested in Argentinian bonds and overall economy; Bessent controls the US purse, we can be very suspicious about this move since it doesn't make any sense for the US to burn money to help bail out Argentina.
If you have a better theory for why this was done it might help reduce the suspicious nature of it. Just calling "there are no sources" doesn't.