[kazinator]

Generally speaking, only images/videos are NSFW-taggable.

The argument can be made than an app which displays religious imagery is not suitable for the workplace, but if it's just a reader with texts, then not.

If someone wants to spy over your shoulder to read text on your screen, and it doesn't jibe with their religion, that is their problem.

And, if that's where the goalposts lie, then atheistic texts could be offensive in such a way. I.e. a Mastodon post claiming "there is no god" should be marked NSFW and blurred out until you click something.

[StopDisinfo910]

There is a world outside the USA where most of what you wrote doesn’t apply.

Here I think the labelling doesn’t really make sense but it never does anyway and pretty much means "this content is part of a corpus American think is objectionable and wouldn’t want to be seen with in public”.

I enjoy the controversy for putting in light the usual imperial blindness however.

[kazinator]

Funny you should mention that because some draft of my comment did specify "North American workplace" but it got lost in some edit.