[timschmidt]

> This is a factual true statement, but you wouldn't accept this as a moral argument in a court.

Self defense, as I pointed out, is a perfectly normal reason to kill someone which is widely accepted as a morally defensible argument in court.

> I think you are over-interpreting me, answering to something I haven't said.

Seeing as your argument was anticipated, and a suitable set of counterexamples was provided preemptively, I think not.

[1718627440]

> Self defense, as I pointed out, is a perfectly normal reason to kill someone which is widely accepted as a moral argument in court.

"I (accidentally) killed him, while trying to protect me." is very different from "Oh, killing is just (second) nature to me, I need the daily kick." When you need to have a serious threat to make you do something, then that thing is in fact not your nature.

> I think not.

I pointed out another example of that meaning of the word "nature" and you answered as if I made claims about morality of killing or slaughtering people/animals?

Sorry to me that felt very much like scope creep.

[timschmidt]

> I think you are over-interpreting me, answering to something I haven't said.

> "Oh, killing is just (second) nature to me, I need the daily kick."

Physician, heal thyself.

[1718627440]

And immibis complained, that my answers are indecipherable... . What do you want to say me with these words?