I don't care what a sycophantic machine "thinks" because I can get any answer I want out of it by subtly changing the phrasing of the question. I thought you had legitimate points to discuss in good faith, not this nonsense.
Take the documentation of GenStage, for example. It is a dry transition between what a stage is into advanced concepts with diagrams are in ASCII. https://hexdocs.pm/gen_stage/GenStage.html
Not only this article dumps significant cognitive load on the reader. It's not well digested and not a soft landing into the subject. Worst of all, many Elixir articles assume familiarity with GenStage.
Not only this article dumps significant cognitive load on the reader. It's not well digested and not a soft landing into the subject. Worst of all, many Elixir articles assume familiarity with GenStage.
Compare it to this, which is not the best example but is a much more soft landing. https://doc.akka.io/libraries/akka-core/current/typed/actors...