|
|
|
|
|
|
by moefh
248 days ago
|
|
|
> Kevin Weil had the two previous quotes in his context when he did his post and didn't consider the fact that readers would only see the first level, so wouldn't have Sebastien Bubek's post in mind when they read his. No, Weil said he himself misunderstood Sellke's post[1]. Note Weil's wording (10 previously unsolved Erdos problems) vs. Sellke's wording (10 Erdos problems that were listed as open). [1] https://x.com/kevinweil/status/1979270343941591525 |
|
|