|
|
|
|
|
by jqpabc123
239 days ago
|
|
Basic aspects of auto design, safety and functionality have been refined by over a century of real world experience and testing. Changes should be considered and evaluated very carefully, particularly where user safety is concerned. Tesla has failed to do this and has boldly "fixed" some things that didn't need fixing in my opinion. An obvious example is door latches. Exiting the vehicle under duress should be as intuitive as possible without written instructions. Expecting passengers to read the manual beforehand is simply absurd and indicative of a basic design failure. Another is moving basic driving feedback info (like speed and range) out of the driver's typical line of sight. But one of the most egregious is mis-labeling driver assistance as "Full Self Driving" which even they admit is purely aspirational at this point. Will Tesla robots be labeled "Sentient" when they clearly are not? |
|