|
|
|
|
|
by the_duke
248 days ago
|
|
In my experience gpt5-codex (medium) and codex-cli is notably better than Sonnet 4.5 and claude-code.
(note: never tried Opus) It is slower, but the results are much more often correct and it doesn't rush into half-baked solutions/dumb approaches as eagerly. I'd much rather wait 5 minutes than have to clean up manually or try to coax a model into doing things differently. I also wouldn't be surprised if the slowness was partially due to OpenAI being quite resource constrained. They are repeatedly complaining about not having sufficient compute. Bigger picture: I think all the AI coding environments are incredibly immature. There are many improvements to be unlocked. |
|
As far as which one is better, it's highly dependent on what we're each doing, but I will say that I have this one project where bare "make" won't work, and I have a script that needs to be run instead. I have instructions to call that script in multiple .md files, and codex is able to call the script instead of make, but it keeps forgetting that and tries to run make which fails and it gets confused. (Claude code running on macOS host but build on Linux vm.) I could work around it, but that really takes the "shiny" factor off of codex+GPT-5 for me.