|
|
|
|
|
by plqbfbv
252 days ago
|
|
I'm 93% useless for having written in 5m a plan that covers all layers of failure, keeps in touch with stakeholders and would very likely lead to the resolution of the issue in <15m (nvm that I literally did this job in the past with great success). The question was loaded as it told me that "stakeholders want to know whether it's your autoscaling script you wrote last week", it gave me the context of "alerts firing off at 2:43 am, nobody knows why" and then afterwards implied I should have replied with a very specific plan to code-review and debug my script... at 2:43 am in production with "catastrophical failures coast to coast". I have the feeling it wanted me to use all the available information to reply, rather than follow a sound plan to respond to an emergency. Without a doubt I should have hotfixed with root cause analysis in 1m in production at 2:43 am after being thrown off the bed, and simply stared at the application recovering for the remaining 4m. I really don't understand what's the point of this LLM-backed roaster, and if there is one, it doesn't seem to close to achieving it. |
|