|
|
|
|
|
by ghshephard
5013 days ago
|
|
As an aggregate model, it would make taxis much more attractive for a lot of people who don't like the uncertainty, smelly cars, crazy drivers, poorly maintained vehicles, and long waiting times. Those people would be much more likely to hire taxis, increasing the business liquidity, reducing the uncertainty for taxi drivers in the business who might go a few hours without a ride. The advantage to drivers, is that an uber customer is identified before they get into the vehicle. They also have the means to pay. The ability to discriminate on source/destination is removed, but, in many taxi regions, they aren't, in theory, allowed to do that anyways. I'm not arguing that 100% of all the uber rules are an advantage for drivers - in particular, the ability to turn down a $30 cab fare in order to wait for the $70 SFO trip will be to their economic disadvantage, but it will result in a healthier business overall. |
|