|
|
|
|
|
by ianferrel
240 days ago
|
|
That is a good point I hadn't considered. I think, charitably, what might have happened here is: 1. Author left out the diagnostic step that restoring the connectivity didn't fix the robot, because it didn't work. 2. Author did the technical analysis mentioned (there is a repository attached. I haven't verified that it actually has the level of technical analysis indicated). 3. Author took some creative liberties (possibly involving some AI-assisted punching-up) when writing the blog post story to make it more compelling in a way that made it feel a bit off and left me and others questioning its veracity. |
|
Skimming the post and skipping past the fluff, I thought it was an interesting situation and bit of debugging.