|
|
|
|
|
|
by kube-system
245 days ago
|
|
|
Courts, in the US at least, can hold an officer of a corporation personally responsible for violating a subpoena order, if they were in a position to comply with it and chose not to. It's not technically a piercing of the corporate veil (because they are being personally ordered to comply), but it's effectively the same thing. See Wilson v. United States https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/221/361/ |
|
|