|
|
|
|
|
by delusional
247 days ago
|
|
> Yes it advanced extremely quickly, but that is not a confirmation of anything. It could just be the technology quickly meeting us at either our limit of compute, or it's limit of capability. To comment om this, because its the most common counter argument. Most technology has worked in steps. We take a step forward, then iterate on essentially the same thing. It's very rare we see order of magnitude improvement on the same fundamental "step". Cars were quite a step forward from donkeys, but modern cars are not that far off from the first ones. Planes were an amazing invention, but the next model of plane is basically the same thing as the first one. |
|
I think we would need another leap to actually meet the markets expectations on AI. The market is expecting AGI, but I think we are probably just going to do incremental improvements for language and multi modal models from here, and not meet those expectations.
I think the market is relying on something that doesn't currently exist to become true, and that is a bit irrational.