[qlm]

This is absurd to the point of being comical. Do you really believe that?

If an “objective” test purports to show that AI is more creative than humans then I’m sorry but the test is deeply flawed. I don’t even need to look at the methodology to confidently state that.

[dr_dshiv]

It’s a point, I suppose, about being clear about what we mean. In psychology, we need to define terms in terms of measures — and we’ve traditionally measured human creativity that way. Not without critique, but true!

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Torrance_Tests_of_Creative_Thi...

[yunnpp]

His comment must be fueled by his own lack of creativity. He has engulfed himself in the AI, and his own knowledge gap prevents him from even scratching the surface of his own stupidity.

[dr_dshiv]

That’s pretty rude. And wrong.