| No, the article incorrectly cites/summarizes the original blog post [1] which indeed seems to pull some numbers out of thin air: > "I’m going to use a bunch of numbers here that I believe to be directionally correct," > "Let’s start with total datacenter spend for 2025. Insiders think it’s going to clock in at around $400 billion." (in the US? worldwide?) > "I am sure I’m off by a few percent in these categories, but I’m relying on AI and we all know it’s still imperfect." > "the AI datacenters to be built in 2025 will suffer $40 billion of annual depreciation, while generating somewhere between $15 and $20 billion of revenue." In a follow-up article [2], the author says that he learned that the investments probably have much less than the 10 years of depreciation time he originally assumed. Again, no external sources are linked. > "Personal self-doubts disappeared, and high-placed individuals reached out to share their epiphanies " So, it seems the author estimated how much money will be invested in AI datacenters in 2025. The 20 billion of annual revenue mentioned in the article are just the share of all AI revenue for these new data centers.
And these numbers have just been estimated by the author - apparently with the help of AI. While the article and the blog posts may have some merit, it seems all based on some guy's assumptions and conversations he claims to have had. [1] https://pracap.com/global-crossing-reborn/ [2] https://pracap.com/an-ai-addendum/ |