|
|
|
|
|
by celrod
258 days ago
|
|
I use kakoune, and don't understand why helix seems to be taking off while kakoune (which predated and inspired helix) remains niche. Kakoune fully embraces the unix philosophy, even going so far as relying on OS (or terminal-multiplexer, e.g. kitty or tmux) for window management (via client/sever, so each kakoune instance can still share state like open buffers). A comparison going into the differences (and embracing of the unix philosophy by kakoune) by someone who uses both kakoune and helix:
https://phaazon.net/blog/more-hindsight-vim-helix-kakoune Sensible defaults and easy setup are a big deal. No one wants to fiddle with setting up their lsp and tree-sitter. There's probably more to their differences in popularity than just this, though. |
|
I think the philosophy of delaying the plugin system as long as possible is one of the reasons helix has achieved that.
With Helix I just have to learn selection first, and few different binds compared to vim. With Kakoune, I have to onboard into a more complex ecosystem, in addition to that. A lot of people already have vim/neovim config fatigue so that's not very compelling.