Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by deng 246 days ago
> Had Ruby Central acquiesced the logs would've been parsed and sold.

Which the privacy policy of RubyCentral allows, so I don't get why they suddenly have ethical problems with that, apart of course from throwing shade on Andre. Parsing logs for company access is what basically everyone does, and frankly, I don't see the problem with getting leads from data like this. That has nothing to do with "selling PII".
1 comments
skywhopper 246 days ago
Yes. While I personally don’t like this practice, it is so widespread and there is so much demand for it that it’s not unusual given their privacy policy makes explicit mention of it.

The best argument you could make is that gem owners should be able to see “who” downloads their gems. If they were self-hosting the packages, they would have that data. Of course, charging for it is the ookier part.

link
deng 246 days ago
Say you provide a service for free and are desperate for corporate sponsorship. Who wouldn't look at what companies are using your service and contact them with "Hey, I'm seeing you are using our service, can we have a chat"? You basically have no other means of contacting companies nowadays without getting into trouble for cold-calling/spamming.
link