|
|
|
|
|
by ayuhito
245 days ago
|
|
> I'd love to know how much LLM was used to write this if any, and how much effort went into it as well (if it was LLM-assisted.) Are people supposed to be obligated to post such a report nowadays? I enjoyed the article and found it really interesting, but seeing these types of comments always kind of puts a damper on it afterwards. |
|
No, typically when I ask questions it's optional.
> I enjoyed the article and found it really interesting, but seeing these types of comments always kind of puts a damper on it afterwards.
That is why I waited half a day, and until after there were lots of comments praising the article. Still, I'm sorry if it put a damper on it for you.
Also the whole reason I asked about the source is because I think the article has a lot of merit and so I am curious if it's because the author put a lot of work in (LLM-assisted or not.) Usually when I get that feeling it's followed by a realization I'm wasting my time on something the author didn't even read closely.
But I didn't get that this time, and I'd love more examples of LLMs being used (with effort, presumably) to produce something the author could take pride in.