|
|
|
|
|
by braza
251 days ago
|
|
As an enthusiast of traffic engineering, the most surprising thing in US is how hard is for the engineers to handle so distinct zoning laws according to it's county/city/state, and urbanistic planning in several big/medium cities is more centered on _giving preference to the cars_ instead of _keep the cadency and flow of the cars_. Not saying it's good or bad, but for instance, in some counties it's way simpler to have a parking lot without any traffic buffer area at the entrance than to get an approval for a roundabout to reduce electronic traffic coordination in feeder roads. Even simple things like pedestrian passages that do not have any contact with the road (elevated passages or underground passages) are very hard to find in the US. I really would like to know one day what kind of design philosophy the traffic engineering field follows with so much compromises. |
|