Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by basepurpose 254 days ago
if the author knows what they're doing and understand the model of the code at least, i don't understand the reason mentioning that it was vibe coded. maybe declaring something is vibe coded removes part of the responsibility nowadays?
1 comments

Someone once told me that their mistake wasn’t theirs, but rather it was ChatGPT being wrong.

I think you have a good point about why people say it was vibe coded.

It might also be because they want to join the trend -- without mentioning vibe coding, I don't think this tool would ever reach #1 on Hacker News.

HN guidelines say one shouldn't question whether another commenter has read TFA, so I won't do that. But TFA explains exactly why it was vibe coded, and exactly why they're mentioning that it was vibe coded, which is that that was the central point of TFA.