|
|
|
|
|
by AlotOfReading
256 days ago
|
|
Stone tools predate even the oldest suggestions of intentional fire use by at least a million years, so the cooking hypothesis isn't particularly compelling. Elsewhere in this thread I've also discussed how it's not really an explanation either. |
|
The stone tools that predate this by a few million years reinforce the cooked food hypothesis in this 'chicken or egg' situation.