[LeroyRaz]

I don't understand how the removing of right wing users is described as a necessary good to create a safe and inclusive space, while the removal of left wing users is decried as censorship. If you dismiss people who have genuine concerns about things as bigoted, you yourself are being bigoted! It is as though people don't understand the definition of the word.

[incompatible]

"people who have genuine concerns about things", things like women, non-whites, LGBTIQ, especially trans, atheists, scientists, anti-fascists, even people who don't follow the MAGA party line, such as idolizing Charley Kirk, the list goes on. "Genuine concerns" which are expressed as undisguised or thinly disguised death threats in some cases.

[LeroyRaz]

To take the example of trans: yes. Multiple different groups have genuine concerns about trans issues. For example, you have trans people wanting to be respected and not victimized, you have women who fear men being in their spaces, you have parents who fear their children being harmed and encouraged to transition, you have female athletes concerned about unfair competition from people who went through male puberty, etc... None of these groups innately hate each other or are bigoted, they just have different opinions on what the best society should be like as shaped by their own experiences.

And all of these groups have a point. Obviously you do get examples of trans people being victimized, you do get examples of children regretting transitioning, you do get examples of unfair athletic competition, etc... It is a complete conspiracy theory to label all of the groups as made of hateful fake news spreading bigots. They are all just human beings, muddling through the world!

[incompatible]

This is always how it goes, first it's just "genuine concerns", and soon enough you've designated a group who are to be the scapegoats with no right to live their own lives as they see fit.