| >Could this reflect your media diet? It could reflect SpaceX's bad PR. I read plenty of news sources, and the most that makes it out there is how the latest Starship blew up, yet again. Not great PR. And beyond that, the scope of the thing is to go to Mars. It's up to SpaceX to get the PR out there, not for me to seek out niche news sources. But thanks for trying to make this about me failing instead of SpaceX failing at PR. >That's kind of wild. I understand getting the PR stuff first, but every newspaper I read mentions Starlink whenever SpaceX comes up, unless it's about a launch explosion or Artemis. Not wild at all. And let's be real, I seriously doubt you read "newspapers". I did a Google search for "SpaceX Starship" and nowhere in 8 pages of results did I see anything mentioning Starlink. In fact, one of the results was for the SpaceX Careers page, which says: >"Work on the Starship program developing the vehicles that will enable large groups of people to travel to the Moon, Mars and beyond. Life at SpaceX. At ..." So even SpaceX is selling it as going to Mars, and not about launching Starlink satelites. But this entire conversion is completely pointless, so I won't be responding to this thread anymore with anything but a canned lame response. You've been warned. |
He's actually right.
When SpaceX talks about making money from Starship. It's Starlink