[greatgib]

If you look at their own stats, they says that for a server that host 150 games, at any given time, they have around 50 games that are in the buy phase.

I don't know how long game rounds last, but if you tell me that you have 60s only locked in that state, that means that the playable game round last around 2 minutes.

And anyway, that you will spend on average 1/3 of your time not playing when you came to play.

Numbers look strange, as 2 minutes looks very low to me for a party, but I don't know how you can explain the ratio of 50/150 otherwise?

And just as an aside, the article in itself tells you that they capitalize on you being in the buying phase to reduce server costs. So looks like that even if they could do something on the game play side to improve that, there would be financial incentives not to do so.

[nemothekid]

Unless you've played Valorant or CS then I don't think it's possible for me explain, in words, the context you are missing.

This game has lots of downtime for the player. For example, a round lasts 100 seconds (then if the bomb is planted, 45 seconds until the bomb explodes). If you die early in the round, you are dead until the start of the next round. Worst case, thats 2 full minutes of downtime for a single player. On top of that the time to kill is VERY low. A single headshot can mean death before you can even react. Compare that to BO6 which in most modes will have an immediate respawns and a relatively high time to kill.

It's not something they are optimizing for financial incentives, it's how the game is played, and how it's been played for 25 years (the originator of the format is Counter Strike).

[greatgib]

It's nothing new. CS but a lot of others are like that. Still, the more years pass since CS, the more you have to wait in the lobby or pre/post gaming. It's not the same when you are in the game even dead. Something happens, the game is running, you can follow what is happening as a ghost.

[simjnd]

> you will spend on average 1/3 of your time not playing when you came to play

The buy phase is playing. It's coordinating with your team on what loadouts to get to best counter the enemy team. The decision making is fun and is play. Because you're not shooting at other players does not mean it is not playing?

[greatgib]

How much fun is it compared to do the shooting?

For this game it is hard to say for me because I don't play it, but I still see complaints about that and the game duration:

https://www.reddit.com/r/VALORANT/comments/169ts34/solution_...

https://www.reddit.com/r/VALORANT/comments/1ekvieo/what_are_...

But generally, for other recent games I have to play, that is a strong complaint that I have. Like BO6 is awful for that for example.

One example I noticed in the past years is with racing games like Burnout. The original game was perfect for a quick relaxing session, you start the game, you play (driving) most of the time. I the last versions of Burnout, you are stuck with hours lost waiting for intro, start and end of race cinematics, that are unskippable. And the whole interface making it painful to have a long session of "really playing" in a row.

Obviously, most often when games are online, despite the fact that there is not a need for a real "loading" phase to reload the same assets 50 times when you play over and over the same game.