[marcusb]

> * Everyone involved is unlikely to find work again anytime soon once names are bandied about in investigations

They might (MIGHT) get fired from their government jobs, but I'll bet they land in consulting shops because of their knowledge of how the government's IT teams operate.

I'll also bet the internal audit team slides out of this completely unscathed.

[disgruntledphd2]

> I'll also bet the internal audit team slides out of this completely unscathed.

They really, really shouldn't. However, if they were shouted down by management (an unfortunately common experience) then it's on management.

The trouble is that you can either be effective at internal audit or popular, and lots of CAE's choose the wrong option (but then, people like having jobs so I dunno).

[tracker1]

Likely it wasn't even (direct) management, but the budgeting handled by politicians and/or political appointees.

[Chris2048]

Which begs the question, Does N Korea have governmental whistle-blower laws and/or services?

Also, internal audit aren't supposed to be the only audit, they are effectively pre-audit prep for external audit. And the first thing an external auditor should do - ask them probing questions about their systems and process.

[xp84]

Wrong Korea, this is South Korea

[mcny]

I have never been to DPRK but based on what I've read, I wouldn't even press "report phishing" button in my work email or any task at work I was not absolutely required to do, much less go out of my way to be a whistleblower.

[disgruntledphd2]

That's true, but by their nature, external audits are rarer so one would have expected the IA people to have caught this first.