[worik]

> who, do you believe, the perpetrators are

Masked, no ID, claim they are from ICE. Thugs.

> the crime of those perpetrators is ( again, be as specific as you can )?

Assault an kidnapping.

> who or what is, in your mind, ultimately responsible for the issue that has embroiled both victims and perpetrators?

Interesting question: Probably capitalists who want cheap labour and are willing to cut corners to get it

[A4ET8a8uTh0_v2]

Friend. I would advise you against taking posts you read online as some sort of legally binding advice. It.. is just not a good idea. I will make it simple for you. Either ICE is a federal level entity with some rights and immunities assigned to it or not.

If they are and they do, then kidnapping seems like, at best, a mischaracterization. I don't want to belabor the point, but it sounds like you a have an axe to grind.

<< Probably capitalists who want cheap labour and are willing to cut corners to get it

Interesting indeed. Not your answer, but rather the logical inconsistency it implies. How would removal of illegal aliens result in cheap labor? I suspect you did not think your answer through. May I suggest less reflexive writing?

[worik]

As to the legality of ICE: The law suits are not being heard yet, time will tell

Legal or illegal what they're doing is wrong

As to capitalists and cheap labour: that is what drove the rise in the population of the undocumented community. I was addressing the cause of that problem

The need for a neo-facist to have an "other" to deamonise is what drives ICE

Capitalists and facists do not have perfectly aligned incentives